Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

958 A.2d 1040, 598 Pa. 548, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1773
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 14, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 96 WAL 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 958 A.2d 1040 (Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 958 A.2d 1040, 598 Pa. 548, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1773 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

[549]*549 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with respect to the following question as rephrased for clarity:

Under Section 306(b) of the Worker’s Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 512(2), may an employer meet its burden of proof to justify modification of an award of workers’ compensation benefits to an injured non-resident employee, based on an earning power assessment which focused on the location of the employee’s residence, as opposed to the location where the injury occurred?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 A.2d 1040, 598 Pa. 548, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2008.