Riddle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Riddle v. State

1929 OK CR 489, 282 P. 369, 45 Okla. Crim. 166, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1929

DocketNo. A-6865.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 489 (Riddle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riddle v. State, 1929 OK CR 489, 282 P. 369, 45 Okla. Crim. 166, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a. charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and to be confined in the county jail for 90 days.

The state procured a search warrant upon an affidavit insufficient upon its face to authorize the issuance of the warrant or the search and seizure thereunder.

Where the only evidence offered by the state is obtained by an illegal search and seizure because the affidavit for the search warrant is insufficient on its face, the cause Avill be reversed.

For the reasons stated, the cause is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a. charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and to be confined in the county jail for 90 days.

The state procured a search warrant upon an affidavit insufficient upon its face to authorize the issuance of the warrant or the search and seizure thereunder.

Where the only evidence offered by the state is obtained by an illegal search and seizure because the affidavit for the search warrant is insufficient on its face, the cause Avill be reversed.

For the reasons stated, the cause is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 489, 282 P. 369, 45 Okla. Crim. 166, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.