Riddle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riddle v. State

232 So. 2d 400, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1970·No. No. M-234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Rivers v. State (Fla.1969) 226 So.2d 337; Myrick v. State (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 845; Tomlinson v. State (1937) 129 Fla. 658, 176 So. 543.

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Rivers v. State (Fla.1969) 226 So.2d 337; Myrick v. State (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 845; Tomlinson v. State (1937) 129 Fla. 658, 176 So. 543.

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Riddle v. State, 232 So. 2d 400, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

232 So. 2d 400 (Riddle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related