Riddle v. Riddle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Riddle v. Riddle

119 S.E.2d 926, 254 N.C. 780, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 536

DecidedMay 24, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E.2d 926 (Riddle v. Riddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riddle v. Riddle, 119 S.E.2d 926, 254 N.C. 780, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 536 (N.C. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CüRiam.

Under Chapter 5 of the General Statutes it is declared, among other things, that “any person guilty of disobedience of any process or order lawfully issued by any court” * * * “may be punished for contempt.” Applying the provisions of this statute to the findings of fact herein, the court below properly adjudged defendant in contempt. Hence the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CüRiam.

Under Chapter 5 of the General Statutes it is declared, among other things, that “any person guilty of disobedience of any process or order lawfully issued by any court” * * * “may be punished for contempt.” Applying the provisions of this statute to the findings of fact herein, the court below properly adjudged defendant in contempt. Hence the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 S.E.2d 926, 254 N.C. 780, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-riddle-nc-1961.