Riddle v. Mott
20 F. Cas. 757, 2 D.C. 73, 2 Cranch 73
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1813
StatusPublished
This text of 20 F. Cas. 757 (Riddle v. Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riddle v. Mott, 20 F. Cas. 757, 2 D.C. 73, 2 Cranch 73 (circtddc 1813).
Opinion
instructed the jury that, under the law of Virginia, it was not necessary to prove a demand upon Ramsay, and notice to the defendant, if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that Ramsay was so insolvent, when the note became payable, (April, 1808,) that such demand and notice would not have been a benefit to the defendant. Qumre.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 757, 2 D.C. 73, 2 Cranch 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-mott-circtddc-1813.