Riddle v. Moss

11 U.S. 206, 3 L. Ed. 317, 7 Cranch 206, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 388
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 10, 1812·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court 'to the following effect.

The Court is of, opinion that Welch, the co-obligor, Was interested, and Whs therefore ap incompetent wit-. *208 ness. It was a consideration of some importance that he had given Moss <i deed of trust of his effects to indemnify him against this suit; but the principal circumstance was, that Welch’s liability would be increased, to • the, extent of the costs of this suit, if the judgment'should be against Moss. *

Judgment reversed„

*

.The same point was .also decided in the case'.of the Governor of Virginia V.- Evans and others, at this term; which'was the case of a bond with collateral condition. It was a joint action; and all the Defendants were taken, but pleaded separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riddle v. Moss, 11 U.S. 206, 3 L. Ed. 317, 7 Cranch 206, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 388 (1812).

11 U.S. 206 (Riddle v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamby v. WNBA, LLC
D. Nevada, 2025
(PC) Shannon v. Inniss-Burton
E.D. California, 2021
Franklin v. . Kidd
114 N.E. 839 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Oexner v. Loehr
93 S.W. 333 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
Finnell v. Cox
60 Ky. 245 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1860)
Commonwealth v. McKee's
2 Grant 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1853)
Austin v. Fuller
12 Barb. 360 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Gayle v. Bishop
14 Ala. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1848)
Kelly v. Lank
46 Ky. 220 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1846)
Chur v. Keckeley
17 S.C.L. 479 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1830)
Owings v. Low
7 H. & J. 124 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1826)
Cannon v. . Jones
11 N.C. 368 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1826)
Sheehy v. Mandeville
11 U.S. 208 (Supreme Court, 1812)