Riddle v. Moss
This text of 11 U.S. 206 (Riddle v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court 'to the following effect.
The Court is of, opinion that Welch, the co-obligor, Was interested, and Whs therefore ap incompetent wit-. *208 ness. It was a consideration of some importance that he had given Moss <i deed of trust of his effects to indemnify him against this suit; but the principal circumstance was, that Welch’s liability would be increased, to • the, extent of the costs of this suit, if the judgment'should be against Moss. *
Judgment reversed„
.The same point was .also decided in the case'.of the Governor of Virginia V.- Evans and others, at this term; which'was the case of a bond with collateral condition. It was a joint action; and all the Defendants were taken, but pleaded separately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 U.S. 206, 3 L. Ed. 317, 7 Cranch 206, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-moss-scotus-1812.