Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia
1 D.C. 96
This text of 1 D.C. 96 (Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia, 1 D.C. 96 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
was for granting thé motion. Marshall, J., for discharging the rule, because there did not appear to be any means of quashing the justice’s execution. Cranch, J., for discharging the rule because the justice’s warrant did not appear to be regular; and if Riddle has been injured, he may bring his action. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-marshal-of-the-district-of-columbia-dcd-1802.