Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia
This text of 20 F. Cas. 757 (Riddle v. Marshal of the District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
was for granting the motion. MARSHALL. Circuit Judge, for discharging the rule, because there did not appear to be any means of quashing the justice’s execution. CRANCH, Circuit Judge, for discharging the rule because the justice’s warrant did not appear to be regular; and if Riddle has been injured, he may bring his action. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 F. Cas. 757, 1 Cranch 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-marshal-of-the-district-of-columbia-circtddc-1802.