Riddle v. Mandeville
1 D.C. 95
This text of 1 D.C. 95 (Riddle v. Mandeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riddle v. Mandeville, 1 D.C. 95 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
refused unanimously to instruct the j ux-y that the transaction was usurious.
A bill of exceptions was taken on the two first points, and the judgment reversed in the Supreme Court of the United States, See 1 Cranch, Rep. 290.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddle-v-mandeville-dcd-1802.