Riddick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riddick v. State

930 So. 2d 837, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9111, 2006 WL 1569103

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2006·No. No. 2D04-5110·Published

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

For the reasons expressed in Allen v. State, 927 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we affirm the trial court’s order continuing Riddick’s commitment based on his 2004 annual review. However, based on the procedural issues discussed in Allen, if Riddick’s 2006 annual review has already occurred or is not expected for more than a few months, Riddick should be given a new annual review hearing at which he may present such evidence as- he feels appropriate. Id. at 1074 n. 5.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STRINGER, Judge.

For the reasons expressed in Allen v. State, 927 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we affirm the trial court’s order continuing Riddick’s commitment based on his 2004 annual review. However, based on the procedural issues discussed in Allen, if Riddick’s 2006 annual review has already occurred or is not expected for more than a few months, Riddick should be given a new annual review hearing at which he may present such evidence as- he feels appropriate. Id. at 1074 n. 5.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Riddick v. State, 930 So. 2d 837, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9111, 2006 WL 1569103 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

930 So. 2d 837 (Riddick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related