Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Riddick v. State

Riddick v. State

930 So. 2d 837, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9111, 2006 WL 1569103
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2006
DocketNo. 2D04-5110
StatusPublished

This text of 930 So. 2d 837 (Riddick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riddick v. State, 930 So. 2d 837, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9111, 2006 WL 1569103 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

For the reasons expressed in Allen v. State, 927 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we affirm the trial court’s order continuing Riddick’s commitment based on his 2004 annual review. However, based on the procedural issues discussed in Allen, if Riddick’s 2006 annual review has already occurred or is not expected for more than a few months, Riddick should be given a new annual review hearing at which he may present such evidence as- he feels appropriate. Id. at 1074 n. 5.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Commitment of Allen
927 So. 2d 1070 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
930 So. 2d 837, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9111, 2006 WL 1569103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddick-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.