Riddell v. Rizzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riddell v. Rizzo

253 A.D. 898, 3 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9170

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 898 (Riddell v. Rizzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riddell v. Rizzo, 253 A.D. 898, 3 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to dissolve a partnership, for an accounting and a division of the partnership assets, the official referee found that the partnership was dissolved and terminated on April 30, 1937, that the partnership assets amount to $5,416.76, that the partnership had no good will value, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover one-half of the assets from the defendant, and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $2,708.38, plus costs and interest. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the ground of error in computing the profits for the last three months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to dissolve a partnership, for an accounting and a division of the partnership assets, the official referee found that the partnership was dissolved and terminated on April 30, 1937, that the partnership assets amount to $5,416.76, that the partnership had no good will value, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover one-half of the assets from the defendant, and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $2,708.38, plus costs and interest. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the ground of error in computing the profits for the last three months.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 898, 3 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddell-v-rizzo-nyappdiv-1938.