Riddell v. Quinlin

875 F.2d 867, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6994, 1989 WL 51384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1989
Docket89-5114
StatusUnpublished

This text of 875 F.2d 867 (Riddell v. Quinlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riddell v. Quinlin, 875 F.2d 867, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6994, 1989 WL 51384 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

875 F.2d 867

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Donald Keith RIDDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael QUINLIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, Claire
Cripe, G.R. McCune, Director, Southeast Regional Office U.S.
Bureau of Prisons, Bill R. Story, Warden, Bill Strange,
Ernest White, M.L. Anderson, Michael Smith, Frederick Roach,
Steve Limpach, Don Guffy, Bob Bastian, John and Jane Doe(s),
Defendants-Appellees,
L.D. Carpenter, Defendant.

No. 89-5114.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 18, 1989.

Before MERRITT and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and DOUGLAS N. HILLMAN, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has failed to respond.

A review of the record indicates that appellant filed a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights complaint on July 29, 1988. By order filed January 17, 1989, the action was dismissed except as to the claims against L.D. Carpenter. Appellant appealed the January 17 order.

No final appealable judgment has been entered. Absent a Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, an order disposing of fewer than all the claims or parties involved in the action is not appealable. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 744 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986). No 54(b) certification was made in the instant appeal. The final decision of the district court has not been entered during the pendency of this appeal; therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction. See Gillis v. Department of HHS, 759 F.2d 565, 569 (6th Cir.1985).

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Douglas W. Hillman, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Wetzel
424 U.S. 737 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Solomon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
782 F.2d 58 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Taylor (Clarence M., Jr.) v. Seaton (Kenneth M.)
875 F.2d 867 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 F.2d 867, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6994, 1989 WL 51384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddell-v-quinlin-ca6-1989.