Riddell, Fox, Holroyd & Jackson, P. C. v. County of Onondaga
152 A.D.2d 914
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1989
StatusPublished
This text of 152 A.D.2d 914 (Riddell, Fox, Holroyd & Jackson, P. C. v. County of Onondaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riddell, Fox, Holroyd & Jackson, P. C. v. County of Onondaga, 152 A.D.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Gill, Korff & Assoc, v County of Onondaga (152 AD2d 912). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tenney, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gill, Korff & Associate v. County of Onondaga
152 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 A.D.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riddell-fox-holroyd-jackson-p-c-v-county-of-onondaga-nyappdiv-1989.