Riday's Estate
21 Pa. D. & C. 585, 1934 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 169
Opinion
Despite the earnest and able presentation by counsel for the exceptants, we are not convinced that the auditing judge erred. The finding of fact, adequately supported by the testimony, that the agreement was signed solely upon the condition that all the obligors should sign (and they did not) is equivalent to a verdict by a jury and is equally conclusive: Byer’s Estate, 14 D. & C. 298; Gross’ Estate, 284 Pa. 73; Copeland’s Estate, 313 Pa. 25.
The exceptions are dismissed, and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riday's Estate, 21 Pa. D. & C. 585, 1934 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 169 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1934).
21 Pa. D. & C. 585 (Riday's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gross's Estate
130 A. 304 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Copeland's Estate
169 A. 367 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)