Rictor v. Rictor

117 A. 925, 139 Md. 697, 1922 Md. LEXIS 168
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 10, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Adkins, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The decree of the lower court, dismissing the original bill, which was filed by the wife, and granting the relief prayed by the husband’s cross-bill, was affirmed as to the original bill, while the cross-bill was dismissed, each side to pay its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rictor v. Rictor, 117 A. 925, 139 Md. 697, 1922 Md. LEXIS 168 (Md. 1922).

117 A. 925 (Rictor v. Rictor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pohzehl v. Pohzehl
109 A.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Bailey v. Bailey
46 A.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)
Wendel v. Wendel
139 A. 573 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1927)