Ricordi v. Mason
210 F. 277, 127 C.C.A. 125, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1907
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 9, 1913·No. No. 76·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
It seems unnecessary to add anything to the two opinions referred to supra. W,e are clearly of the opinion that these extremely brief epitomes of the plots of the two operas, the librettos of which have been copyrighted and are the property of complainant, are neither of them in any true sense “a version” of the copyrighted work, as that word is used in the statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ricordi v. Mason, 210 F. 277, 127 C.C.A. 125, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1907 (2d Cir. 1913).
210 F. 277 (Ricordi v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toho Co., Ltd. v. William Morrow and Co., Inc.
33 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (C.D. California, 1998)
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
996 F.2d 1366 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting System
131 F. Supp. 165 (S.D. California, 1955)
Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
121 F.2d 572 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Macmillan Co. v. King
223 F. 862 (D. Massachusetts, 1914)