Ricordi v. John Church Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Ricordi v. John Church Co.

114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4914

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 3, 1902·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I cannot see that the law as to jurisdiction is any better settled than it was when this court decided National Button Works v. Wade (C. C.) 72 Fed. 298. Whatever qualification of the broad statements of the opinion in Re Hohorst, 150 U. S. 659, 14 Sup. Ct 221. 37 L. Ed. 1211. was supposed to be found in Railroad Co. v. Gonzales, 151 U. S. 496, 14 Sup. Ct. 401, 38 L. Ed. 248, cannot any longer be accepted as settled, since In re Keasbey & Mattison Co., 160 U. S. 229, 16 Sup. Ct. 273, 40 L. Ed. 402. Within the language of the Hohorst opinion, this court has jurisdiction. Motion for preliminary injunction is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I cannot see that the law as to jurisdiction is any better settled than it was when this court decided National Button Works v. Wade (C. C.) 72 Fed. 298. Whatever qualification of the broad statements of the opinion in Re Hohorst, 150 U. S. 659, 14 Sup. Ct 221. 37 L. Ed. 1211. was supposed to be found in Railroad Co. v. Gonzales, 151 U. S. 496, 14 Sup. Ct. 401, 38 L. Ed. 248, cannot any longer be accepted as settled, since In re Keasbey & Mattison Co., 160 U. S. 229, 16 Sup. Ct. 273, 40 L. Ed. 402. Within the language of the Hohorst opinion, this court has jurisdiction. Motion for preliminary injunction is granted.

Ricordi v. John Church Co., 114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4914 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

114 F. 1023 (Ricordi v. John Church Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related