Rico-Perez v. Rico-Perez
756 So. 2d 187, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967, 2000 WL 346146
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rico-Perez v. Rico-Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 734 So. 2d 1177 →
Opinion
The former husband has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for an accounting of child support payments. See Bacardi v. Bacardi, 727 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 741 So.2d 1134 (Fla.1999). Moreover, “no showing has been made ... to warrant such a monumental intrusion into [the former wife’s] financial records.” Bacardi, 727 So.2d at 1138. Therefore, we affirm.
The remaining issue that the former husband has raised on appeal lacks merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rico-Perez v. Rico-Perez, 756 So. 2d 187, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967, 2000 WL 346146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
756 So. 2d 187 (Rico-Perez v. Rico-Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bacardi v. Bacardi
727 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)