Ricky Penick, Jr. v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-20-00251-CR
RICKY PENICK, JR., APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-02461-CRF-272, Honorable Travis B. Bryan III, Presiding
January 4, 2021 ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Ricky Penick, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s judgment revoking his
community supervision for the offense of driving while intoxicated. The appellate record
was originally due November 9, 2020. The clerk’s record was timely filed. However, the
reporter’s record was not filed because appellant did not request preparation or make
payment arrangements for the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2; 35.3(b)(2), (3). By letter
of November 10, 2020, we directed appellant to do so by November 20, or we would
remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). On November 19, 2020, appellant’s counsel filed a letter with the clerk of this court
representing that “. . . per the Court’s order, I have requested the preparation of the
reporter’s record via email (see attached) and will hand deliver a check as soon as I have
a dollar amount.” The reporter has since notified the court that although she sent an
invoice to appellant’s counsel on November 19, appellant has not made payment
arrangements for the record to date.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to
determine the following:
(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether appellant is entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without
charge pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.2; and
(3) if appellant is not entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without
charge, the date appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for
the reporter’s record.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this court by January
21, 2021. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be
requested before January 21, 2021.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ricky Penick, Jr. v. State (Ricky Penick, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.