Ricky M. Arntsen v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:26-cv-05135-JCC-BAT v. ORDER DIRECTING ELECTRONIC SERVICE AND PROCEDURES OF CORRECTIONS, et al., D f d t

This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Defendants removed to this Court. Plaintiff is proceeding with this action pro se. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Washington Corrections Center at Stafford Creek, Aberdeen, Washington and is subject to Mandatory Electronic E-Filing pursuant to General Orders 02-15 and 06-16. The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint ORDERS as follows: 1. Service by Clerk The Clerk is directed to send by E-MAIL SERVICE the following to defendants: Washington State Department of Corrections, SCCC Corrections Officer Tracey Davis, Terisse Siek, Don Spivey, and Jeffrey Tatro a copy of plaintiff’s amended complaint, this Order, two copies of the Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, a Waiver of Service of Summons, and a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the Clerk’s office. The Clerk shall also send by e-mail a courtesy copy of the complaint and of this Order to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office. 2. Response Required Defendants shall have 30 days within which to return the enclosed waiver of service of

summons. Any defendant who timely returns the signed waiver shall have 60 days after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an answer to the complaint or a motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any defendant who fails to timely return the signed waiver will be personally served with a summons and complaint and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2). A defendant who has been personally served shall file an answer or motion permitted under Rule 12 within 21 days after service. Defendants MUST serve a Rand notice concurrently with motions to dismiss based on a failure to exhaust and motions for summary judgment so that pro se prisoner plaintiffs will have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in order to oppose

those motions. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth Circuit set forth model language for such notices: A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and documents and

show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added). Defendants who do not file and serve, in a separate document, the required Rand notice will face (a) immediate denial of their motions with leave to refile and (b) possible monetary sanctions. 3. Filing and Service by Parties Generally All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

Plaintiff is a pro se prisoner must utilize the Mandatory Electronic E-Filing procedure set forth in General Orders 02-15 and 06-16. Pleadings and documents that are not submitted using the mandatory electronic e-filing procedure will be stricken. All filings must indicate in the upper right-hand corner the name of the Magistrate Judge to whom the document is directed. Additionally, any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in this case. 4. Motions Regarding the filing of motions before the Court, the parties are directed to review Local Rule CR 7 in its entirety. A few important points are highlighted below: Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. Pursuant to Local Rule CR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall

be submitted as a part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for consideration upon the court’s motion calendar. In all instances where one of the parties to a lawsuit is incarcerated, all categories of non-dispositive motions not listed in Local Rule CR 7(d)(1) must be noted for the third Friday after the date of filing and service. See Local Rule CR 7(d)(2). All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the motion. 5. Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with

regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 6. The Clerk shall provide a copy of this Order to the parties. DATED this 20th day of February, 2026. A BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge