Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Howard Wayne Davis Cheryl Higgins James L. Hope Wanda Faye Jenkins

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19095, 1995 WL 323860
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 1995
Docket95-6332
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Howard Wayne Davis Cheryl Higgins James L. Hope Wanda Faye Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Howard Wayne Davis Cheryl Higgins James L. Hope Wanda Faye Jenkins, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19095, 1995 WL 323860 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky Lee JENKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Howard Wayne DAVIS; Cheryl Higgins; James L. Hope; Wanda
Faye Jenkins, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6332.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 31, 1995.

Ricky Lee Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Ricky Lee Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jenkins v. Davis, No. CA-95-76-R (W.D.Va. Jan 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for oral argument is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bernard v. School Bd. of City of Norfolk
58 F. Supp. 2d 669 (E.D. Virginia, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19095, 1995 WL 323860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricky-lee-jenkins-v-howard-wayne-davis-cheryl-higg-ca4-1995.