Ricky Kennedy v. Office Rome Captain Newkirk Sgt. Moore

Fourth Circuit

Ricky Kennedy v. Office Rome Captain Newkirk Sgt. Moore

16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7487, 1994 WL 19930

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 1994

Docket90-7406

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 410 (Ricky Kennedy v. Office Rome Captain Newkirk Sgt. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricky Kennedy v. Office Rome Captain Newkirk Sgt. Moore, 16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7487, 1994 WL 19930 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 410
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky KENNEDY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
OFFICE ROME; Captain Newkirk; Sgt. Moore, Defendants Appellees.

No. 90-7406.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 1991.
Jan. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge.

Ricky Kennedy, appellant pro se.

Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Kennedy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kennedy v. Rome, CA-90-316 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 410
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky KENNEDY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
OFFICE ROME; Captain Newkirk; Sgt. Moore, Defendants Appellees.

No. 90-7406.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 1991.
Jan. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge.

Ricky Kennedy, appellant pro se.

Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Kennedy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kennedy v. Rome, CA-90-316 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7487, 1994 WL 19930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricky-kennedy-v-office-rome-captain-newkirk-sgt-mo-ca4-1994.