Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2024
Docket2022-2620
StatusPublished

This text of Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame (Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2022-2620 _____________________________

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellant,

v.

STACEY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR., LEAH JAMES FRAME, et al.,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Leon County. Augustus D. Aikens, Jr., Judge.

February 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed a complaint against several employees of the Florida Department of Corrections, alleging they mishandled his personal property. Appellant Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing, among other things, that Secretary Dixon was entitled to sovereign immunity pursuant to section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes. The lower court denied the motion to dismiss. This timely appeal followed. An order denying a motion to dismiss is a non-final order and not typically reviewable on appeal. However, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(F)(ii) allows appeals of non-final orders that deny a motion that asserts entitlement to immunity under section 768.28(9). This Court can therefore review the denial of the sovereign immunity claim.

Appellee’s complaint alleges that certain Department of Corrections employees destroyed his boxes of legal documents. He alleges that the employees’ actions were retaliatory and intentionally done in bad faith with a malicious purpose. The state is immune from tort claims that are based on an employee acting in bad faith or with a malicious purpose. So, as pled, Secretary Dixon, in his official capacity as the head of the Department of Corrections, is immune.

REVERSED.

RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame, et al., pro se, Appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Stacy Antonio Scott, Jr., Leah James Frame, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricky-d-dixon-secretary-of-the-florida-department-of-corrections-v-stacy-fladistctapp-2024.