Ricky Cavazos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 2012·No. 04-12-00542-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00542-CR

Ricky CAVAZOS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR5842 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 24, 2012

DISMISSED

On September 12, 2012, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before October 12, 2012. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not respond. The record does not contain a certification

that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the 04-12-00542-CR

record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant;

therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricky Cavazos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Ricky Cavazos v. State (Ricky Cavazos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)