Ricks v. State

224 So. 2d 413, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5529
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1969·No. No. 69-120·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to appellant’s first point on appeal regarding whether sufficient evi-[414]*4144ence existed to support the trial court’s finding that the assault appellant was convicted for was committed with a deadly weapon, this question is one for the trier of fact. Blitch v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 1. As to appellant’s second point on appeal, that the proof adduced at trial was materially at variance with the information by virtue of the fact that the information charged the appellant with assaulting his victim by use of a brick, whereas proof at trial tended to show that the assault was committed with a rock, we find this contention to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricks v. State, 224 So. 2d 413, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5529 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

224 So. 2d 413 (Ricks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Killenger
475 A.2d 276 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1984)
Brownlee v. State
427 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Grissom v. State
405 So. 2d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Grimsley v. State
251 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)