Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

410 F. App'x 665
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1615
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 410 F. App'x 665 (Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 410 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[666]*666Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adeline Cotton Ricks seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Ricks v. Newport News Shpbldg., Nos. 08-0251; 08-0877; 09-0567 (BRB May 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
181 L. Ed. 2d 170 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F. App'x 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricks-v-newport-news-shipbuilding-dry-dock-co-ca4-2011.