Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

410 F. App'x 665
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2011·No. No. 10-1615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[666]*666Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adeline Cotton Ricks seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Ricks v. Newport News Shpbldg., Nos. 08-0251; 08-0877; 09-0567 (BRB May 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 410 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2011).

410 F. App'x 665 (Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ricks v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
181 L. Ed. 2d 170 (Supreme Court, 2011)