Ricks v. Fahey

Fourth Circuit

Ricks v. Fahey

203 F. App'x 464

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2006·No. No. 06-6920·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Ricks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ricks v. Lahey, No. 3:06-cv-00153-RLW (E.D.Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [465]*465materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Ricks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ricks v. Lahey, No. 3:06-cv-00153-RLW (E.D.Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [465]*465materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ricks v. Fahey, 203 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

203 F. App'x 464 (Ricks v. Fahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related