Ricks v. Dodier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ricks v. Dodier

109 So. 3d 805, 2012 WL 5623299, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19832

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 16, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-3487

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 805 (Ricks v. Dodier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricks v. Dodier, 109 So. 3d 805, 2012 WL 5623299, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Ricks appeals the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence With Minor Children, alleging that the judgment was improperly entered without an evidentiary hearing, based on a stipulation that only provided for the extension of a temporary injunction previously entered. Ricks is correct. Because the Final Judgment was [806]*806erroneously entered, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Ricks appeals the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence With Minor Children, alleging that the judgment was improperly entered without an evidentiary hearing, based on a stipulation that only provided for the extension of a temporary injunction previously entered. Ricks is correct. Because the Final Judgment was [806]*806erroneously entered, we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 3d 805, 2012 WL 5623299, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricks-v-dodier-fladistctapp-2012.