Rickman v. Oregon State Penitentiary
754 P.2d 33, 91 Or. App. 166
This text of 754 P.2d 33 (Rickman v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rickman v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 754 P.2d 33, 91 Or. App. 166 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of violating a disciplinary rule and required him to pay a $200 fine. He contends only that the fine is invalid. We agree. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
754 P.2d 33, 91 Or. App. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickman-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.