Rickman v. Lanier

Supreme Court of Florida

Rickman v. Lanier

103 So. 128, 88 Fla. 531

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for [532]*532’ the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to he given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court he, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.-

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for [532]*532’ the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to he given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court he, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Rickman v. Lanier, 103 So. 128, 88 Fla. 531 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 128 (Rickman v. Lanier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.