Rickicki v. Borden Chem.

2018 NY Slip Op 1830

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: March 16, 2018
• Docket: 1099 CA 15-02156
• Status: Published

Opinion

Rickicki v Borden Chem. (2018 NY Slip Op 01830)

Rickicki v Borden Chem.

2018 NY Slip Op 01830

Decided on March 16, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 16, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

1099 CA 15-02156

[*1]PATRICIA A. RICKICKI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID P. RICKICKI, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

BORDEN CHEMICAL, DIVISION OF BORDEN, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, UNIMIN CORPORATION AND U.S. SILICA COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 1.)

MICHAEL C. CROWLEY AND SHARON M. CROWLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

C-E MINERALS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, UNIMIN CORPORATION, UNIMIN SPECIALTY MINERALS, INC., MEYERS CHEMICALS, U.S. SILICA COMPANY, MALVERN MINERALS COMPANY, FERRO CORPORATION, NYCO MINERALS COMPANY AND CHARLES B. CHRYSTAL CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (ACTION NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (WILLIAM A. QUINLAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

NATHAN A. SCHACHTMAN, ESQ., P.C., NEW YORK CITY (NATHAN A. SCHACHTMAN OF COUNSEL), BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, BUFFALO, AND SMITH, MURPHY & SCHOEPPERLE, LLP, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS UNIMIN CORPORATION, UNIMIN SPECIALTY MINERALS, INC., MEYERS CHEMICALS, AND U.S. SILICA

CHRYSTAL CO., INC.

Appeal from a corrected order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered October 14, 2015. The corrected order granted the motions and cross motions of defendants-respondents for summary judgment dismissing the complaints against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Kolasz v Levitt , 63 AD2d 777, 779 [3d Dept 1978]).

Entered: March 16, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court