Ricketts v. Weeden

64 Ala. 548
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

-The amendment of the complaint did not, as was supposed by the court below, introduce a new cause of action : it merely corrected a misdescription of the note sued on. On the authority of Long v. Patterson, 51 Ala. 414, and Stringer v. Waters, at the present term (63 Ala. 361), the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricketts v. Weeden, 64 Ala. 548 (Ala. 1879).

64 Ala. 548 (Ricketts v. Weeden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. Talladega Real Estate & Loan Ass'n
126 Ala. 296 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)