Ricketts v. Ramsdell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ricketts v. Ramsdell

89 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 89 N.Y.S. 1114 (Ricketts v. Ramsdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricketts v. Ramsdell, 89 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think the circumstances connected with the acceptance of the juror whose impartiality is in question in these proceedings were "such as to require the granting, of the motion for a new trial in the interests of justice. The order denying such motion should therefore be reversed, but upon' payment by the appellants of the costs of the trial! within 20 days from the entry of this order. Order reversed on the condition named, and new trial granted; costs to abide the event. On the failure of the appellants to comply with the condition, order affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think the circumstances connected with the acceptance of the juror whose impartiality is in question in these proceedings were "such as to require the granting, of the motion for a new trial in the interests of justice. The order denying such motion should therefore be reversed, but upon' payment by the appellants of the costs of the trial! within 20 days from the entry of this order. Order reversed on the condition named, and new trial granted; costs to abide the event. On the failure of the appellants to comply with the condition, order affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricketts-v-ramsdell-nyappdiv-1904.