Ricketts v. Capwell
This text of 77 A. 464 (Ricketts v. Capwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The object of the bill in this case was to enforce by a decree for specific performance, an alleged parol agreement in relation to land. The answer contained a distinct denial of all of the material allegations of the bill and the court found that the testimony produced by the plaintiff upon the controlling question of fact in the case was far from being clear and convincing. This finding appears to have been fully warranted by the evidence and it will not be disturbed.
The decree dismissing the bill is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A. 464, 228 Pa. 268, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricketts-v-capwell-pa-1910.