Rickett v. Cornell-Dubilier Corp.

251 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7868

This text of 251 A.D. 830 (Rickett v. Cornell-Dubilier Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rickett v. Cornell-Dubilier Corp., 251 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, in favor of plaintiff, reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Plaintiff, one of defendant’s employees, claims to have been injured by reason of the closing of a window upon his hand in the loft in which he was engaged to work. His claim is that while his employment began at seven o’clock in the evening, he arrived a few minutes before, entered upon the premises and, without removing his coat or any of his clothing, went to the window to assure himself that his automobile was safe. The sole Issue raised on this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff’s remedy for damages is governed by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. We think [831]*831that it is. (Bodie v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co., 240 App. Div. 856; affd., 264 N. Y. 556, and cases there cited.) Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bodie v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
240 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Bodie v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
264 N.Y. 556 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickett-v-cornell-dubilier-corp-nyappdiv-1937.