Rickert v. Tomat
732 So. 2d 414, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4644, 1999 WL 212988
This text of 732 So. 2d 414 (Rickert v. Tomat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rickert v. Tomat, 732 So. 2d 414, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4644, 1999 WL 212988 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We agree that the jury’s causation finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence and affirm the trial court’s order granting a new trial on the issue of damages. See Bach v. Murray, 658 So.2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The new trial is to be geared toward resolving all damages issues.
Affirmed with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bach v. Murray
658 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 414, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4644, 1999 WL 212988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickert-v-tomat-fladistctapp-1999.