Rickert v. Snyder
5 Wend. 104
This text of 5 Wend. 104 (Rickert v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rickert v. Snyder, 5 Wend. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).
Opinion
By the Court,
There cannot be a demurrer and a plea to the same part of a declaration. 1 Chitty, 230. The plea of non est factum, with the notice of special matter set up in this case, is equivalent to a special plea to each breach, and having pleaded to the whole declaration, the defendant cannot also demur. The motion is granted with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Loth v. Faconesowich
22 Mo. App. 68 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Commonwealth ex rel. Sweeney v. Housekeeper
2 Foster 289 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1874)
Townsend v. Jemison
48 U.S. 706 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Alexander v. Sutlive
3 Ga. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
People ex rel. Budd v. Ten Eyck
13 Wend. 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)
Vermont v. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel
28 F. Cas. 1155 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1827)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Wend. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickert-v-snyder-nysupct-1830.