Rickert v. Snyder

5 Wend. 104
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1830·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

There cannot be a demurrer and a plea to the same part of a declaration. 1 Chitty, 230. The plea of non est factum, with the notice of special matter set up in this case, is equivalent to a special plea to each breach, and having pleaded to the whole declaration, the defendant cannot also demur. The motion is granted with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rickert v. Snyder, 5 Wend. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 Wend. 104 (Rickert v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loth v. Faconesowich
22 Mo. App. 68 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Commonwealth ex rel. Sweeney v. Housekeeper
2 Foster 289 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1874)
Townsend v. Jemison
48 U.S. 706 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Alexander v. Sutlive
3 Ga. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
People ex rel. Budd v. Ten Eyck
13 Wend. 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)
Vermont v. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel
28 F. Cas. 1155 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1827)