Rickert Rice Milling Co. v. Fontenot
This text of 79 F.2d 700 (Rickert Rice Milling Co. v. Fontenot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On consideration of the application for an injunction to stay collection of taxes levied under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended by the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 USCA § 601 et seq.), the court is of the opinion that the taxpayer has a remedy at law to recover back any taxes illegally exacted, and, further, that the provisions of the act as amended deprive the court of jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief.
It is ordered that the application be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F.2d 700, 16 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240, 16 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickert-rice-milling-co-v-fontenot-ca5-1935.