Rickert Rice Milling Co. v. Fontenot
79 F.2d 700, 16 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240, 16 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 853
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 5, 1935·No. No. 7937·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
On consideration of the application for an injunction to stay collection of taxes levied under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended by the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 USCA § 601 et seq.), the court is of the opinion that the taxpayer has a remedy at law to recover back any taxes illegally exacted, and, further, that the provisions of the act as amended deprive the court of jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief.
It is ordered that the application be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rickert Rice Milling Co. v. Fontenot, 79 F.2d 700, 16 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240, 16 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 853 (5th Cir. 1935).
79 F.2d 700 (Rickert Rice Milling Co. v. Fontenot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kingan & Co. v. Smith
16 F. Supp. 549 (S.D. Indiana, 1936)
In re Processing Tax Case
13 F. Supp. 218 (W.D. Texas, 1935)