Rickert-Finlay Realty Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.
This text of 157 A.D. 930 (Rickert-Finlay Realty Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the testimony as to statements by Mr. Mackay, in view of the evidence of his authority as defendant’s manager, raised a question of waiver for the jury; also that defendant’s return of Mr. King’s itemized statement of the expense of completion, without objection to its form, coupled with a denial of liability, waived defendant’s right afterwards to demand a more formal certificate by the architect. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.D. 930, 142 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickert-finlay-realty-co-v-illinois-surety-co-nyappdiv-1913.