Ricker v. Gerrish

124 Mass. 367, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 325
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 12, 1878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

At the time of the death of Gerrish, the action being still pending against the other defendant, the administratrix of Gerrish could not be summoned in to defend. New Haven & Northampton Co. v. Hayden, 119 Mass. 361. Cochrane v. Cushing, ante, 219. The order of the court, after the return of the summons to her, that no default should be entered until further notice, extended the time within which she might file a motion to dismiss. That motion was therefore seasonably made and rightly granted. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricker v. Gerrish, 124 Mass. 367, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 325 (Mass. 1878).

124 Mass. 367 (Ricker v. Gerrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Butler
63 N.E. 949 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Tucker v. Utley
47 N.E. 198 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)