Rickel v. Stockman

168 A. 467, 111 N.J.L. 294, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 337
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 27, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 A. 467 (Rickel v. Stockman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rickel v. Stockman, 168 A. 467, 111 N.J.L. 294, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 337 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

*296 Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of that court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Case, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. American Industrial Inv. Co.
207 S.W.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Clark v. Sears
171 A. 557 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A. 467, 111 N.J.L. 294, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickel-v-stockman-nj-1933.