Rickards' Lessee v. Rickards
This text of 1 Del. Cas. 200 (Rickards' Lessee v. Rickards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion this plot is not evidence. It should have been filed to make it part of the proceedings in the former cause. The defendant was at liberty to have run the same lines and placed them on his pretensions in this cause.
Defendant’s counsel offered a copy of courses of “Digg’spoint,” which recited very briefly a warrant and gave the courses and distances in words and figures, and the quantity without plot or naming itself to be a survey, certified by Callahan with seal of office as truly extracted, etc. Objected to, and submitted to the court without argument.
This is the manner of certifying surveys from Maryland as extracts of course without plots.
It was read.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Del. Cas. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickards-lessee-v-rickards-delctcompl-1798.