Rick Soliz v. Montgomery County Appraisal District
This text of Rick Soliz v. Montgomery County Appraisal District (Rick Soliz v. Montgomery County Appraisal District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00030-CV ____________________
RICK SOLIZ, Appellant
V.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee ________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-12-14656-CV ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rick Soliz, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal with the trial court on January
18, 2018. Despite written notices from this Court and an opportunity to cure, to date,
Appellant has neither filed the appropriate documentation to establish indigence nor
paid the filing fee for the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. In addition, no clerk’s
record has been filed, and the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal
informed the Court that Appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee
and did not make arrangements to pay for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
On April 4, 2018, we notified appellant that, if he is unable to pay for the
appellate record and cannot pay this court’s filing fee, he must return a properly
completed and executed form statement of inability to pay costs, together with a
motion to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a determination
of indigence. In reply, Appellant refused to submit a properly completed and
executed form statement of inability to pay costs and complained that this Court was
asking him “to swear to and provide a different document judged by different
standards which he may or may not meet.” Appellant’s request to proceed without
payment of costs is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c).
Appellant failed to comply with a notice requiring action within a specified
time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on May 16, 2018 Opinion Delivered May 17, 2018
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rick Soliz v. Montgomery County Appraisal District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rick-soliz-v-montgomery-county-appraisal-district-texapp-2018.