Richtman v. Richtman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richtman v. Richtman

207 A.D.2d 336, 616 N.Y.S.2d 210

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 336 (Richtman v. Richtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richtman v. Richtman, 207 A.D.2d 336, 616 N.Y.S.2d 210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiff from (1) [337]*337stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), entered November 15, 1991, and (2) as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated April 10, 1992, as purportedly denied her motion for renewal.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from for reasons stated by Justice Kuffner at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from that portion of the order allegedly denying the plaintiff’s motion for renewal must be dismissed since it contains no decretal paragraph denying that motion (see, Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536, 542-543). Thus, the motion for renewal remains pending and undecided. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI