Richter v. Union Trust Co.

115 U.S. 55, 5 S. Ct. 1162, 29 L. Ed. 345, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1814
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 4, 1885·No. 839·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied. Equity Rule 70 has'ho application to this case, and the affidavits presented do not show such facts as render it necessary for this court to make any special order in tiie premises. Under Rev. Stat. § 866 “ any Circuit Court, upon application to it as a court of equity, may, according to the uses of chancery, direct depositions to be taken in perpetuam rev rnemoriarn, if they relate to any matter that may be cognizable in any court of the United States.” There is nothing in the motion papers to indicate that the appellant may not proceed under this statute to take and perpetuate his testimony, if he has reason to fear that it will otherwise be lost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richter v. Union Trust Co., 115 U.S. 55, 5 S. Ct. 1162, 29 L. Ed. 345, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1814 (1885).

115 U.S. 55 (Richter v. Union Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Hanover Ins. Co.
488 So. 2d 181 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)
W. H. Elliott & Sons, Inc. v. E. & F. King & Co.
22 F.R.D. 280 (D. New Hampshire, 1957)
Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Haworth
84 F.2d 695 (Eighth Circuit, 1936)
Arizona v. California
292 U.S. 341 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Richter v. Jerome
25 F. 679 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1885)