Richter v. Thornton

16 Ohio C.C. 637
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ohio C.C. 637 (Richter v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richter v. Thornton, 16 Ohio C.C. 637 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Section 6476, Revised Statutes, provides that unless accompanied with an order to arrest, the summons, in an action pending before a Justice of the Peace, must be. served at least three day3 before the time of appearance. This was not done in this case.

It is clear that the decisions of the courts of the country on the question whether a judgment so rendered is absolutely void or only erroneous are in direct conflict. We are of the opinion, however, that the weight of authority is that such a judgment is absolutely void, and that such is the tendency of the decisions iu Ohio, though there is none on the exact question, We think that the decision of the common pleas so holding was right, and the action of the plaintiff will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ohio C.C. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richter-v-thornton-ohiocirct-1898.