Richter v. Richter
Opinion
ORDER
Lisa Richter (Mother) appeals from a judgment declining to award sole physical custody to Mother or terminate child support payments to Daniel Richter (Father). On appeal, Mother argues that substantial evidence shows a substantial change in circumstances justifying an award of sole custody and that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to find such change. She also argues that the court abused its discretion by not rebutting the presumed Form 14 amount for child support as unjust or inappropriate. Having carefully considered Mother’s contentions on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the decision of the trial court. A published formal opinion would have no precedential value, and the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
275 S.W.3d 303 (Richter v. Richter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.