Richter v. Novo Corp.

329 N.E.2d 665, 36 N.Y.2d 757, 368 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1795
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 329 N.E.2d 665 (Richter v. Novo Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richter v. Novo Corp., 329 N.E.2d 665, 36 N.Y.2d 757, 368 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1795 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (See Sirlin Plumbing Co. v Maple Hill Homes, 20 NY2d 401; Behren v Papworth, 30 NY2d 532; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp 62-63.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sirlin Plumbing Co. v. Maple Hill Homes, Inc.
230 N.E.2d 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Behren v. Papworth
281 N.E.2d 178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 N.E.2d 665, 36 N.Y.2d 757, 368 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richter-v-novo-corp-ny-1975.