Richter v. Macon Gas Co.

95 S.E. 10, 147 Ga. 600, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 54
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 16, 1918·No. No. 346·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where in a suit for different forms of relief a demurrer is sustained as to so much of the petition as relates to specified portions of the relief prayed for, and is overruled as to the remaining portion, and exceptions pendente lite to the adverse ruling are presented by the plaintiff and are duly allowed and filed, and a final bill of exceptions, also sued out by the plaintiff, is dismissed in the Supreme Court on the ground that it is prematurely brought, such dismissal will not destroy the exceptions pendente lite; but after final judgment in the case error may be assigned on the rulings excepted to pendente lite, in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the final judgment. Durrence v. Waters, 143 Ga. 223 (84 S. E. 471).

2. A suit in equity against several persons, concerning several things of distinct natures, is demurrable. Conley v. Buck, 100 Ga. 187 (28 S. E. 97); Marshall v. Means, 12 Ga. 61 (56 Am. D. 444). Applying this rule the judgment of the trial-court, holding the petition (the substance of which is set forth in Richter v. Macon Gas Co., 144 Ga. 650, 87 S. E. 895), to be multifarious, will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richter v. Macon Gas Co., 95 S.E. 10, 147 Ga. 600, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 54 (Ga. 1918).

95 S.E. 10 (Richter v. Macon Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Hall
195 S.E. 731 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Redmond Co.
166 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Walker v. Walker
95 S.E. 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)