Richter Bros. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 476
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 19, 1960
DocketNo. 64213; protest 59/17213 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 476 (Richter Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richter Bros. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 476 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the [477]*477subject of Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States (44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richter Bros. v. United States
44 C.C.P.A. 128 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richter-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1960.